The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue. Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth, while others claim that it damages local industries. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Nowadays, transportation of goods across countries has increased significantly as a result of globalisation. While some people believe this is essential for the growth of economy, others feel it hampers the businesses of local industries. Although it is important that local industries should be allowed to flourish, overall growth of the economy is key for development of the nation and also its people.
Local industries tend to be suffer when large multinational companies venture in similar fields. One of the reasons is that these giant companies have more revenue which can be invested for worldwide transportation as compared to the small native industries. For example, simple industries like clothing and textile are affected because of international brands like Levis or Puma because of their widespread marketing. These small companies are unable to compete with their larger counterparts. This shows how small companies lose because of loss of global marketing.
However, international companies are known to provide increased job opportunities for the local community. As the company flourishes there is increased income for the people and gross economy for the nation. An example of this is cities like Hongkong, which have large scale companies and provide jobs to millions of people. Also, many people are involved in the transportation of these goods and this further adds to the employment opportunities. In addition to this, the enhanced free movement of goods also promotes international cooperation and global consumerism. This proves that international companies are essential for the national economy.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that , despite the drawback of damaging the economy of local industries , global mobilization of goods has far more advantages for the people and also for the financial development of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... In conclusion, I strongly feel that , despite the drawback of damaging the ec...
^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...damaging the economy of local industries , global mobilization of goods has far mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59717314488 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12950985752 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52296819788 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9462972836 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182029854662 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681778514544 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611053627832 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130184546108 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068841895582 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.