The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020.
The bar graph illustrates about proportion of citizens in accordance to age groups in Iceland from 1990 till 2020.
To begin with, it is clear by analysing histogram that, adult age group represented higher proportion (32%) in comparison to other four during first year (1990). Whereas, children (0-14) and teenagers (15-24) shown difference of 5% in proportion. Yet, other two which included 55-64 and 64+ over, these groups were on similar proportion of 12%. Furthermore, in era of 2000, once more adult citizens (24-54) had higher count (35%) rather than others. Yet, children were on same proportion while teenagers became decreased with little proportion of 19%. However, other two groups were represented similar percentage with difference of 1% respectively.
On contrast, during second last year (2010), 24-54 age group was on maximum number with 39%. Whereas, 0-14 years age was decreased with 2% and similarly, youngsters were minimised with count of 15%. Likewise previous year, 55-64 and 64+ over group had similar percentage with difference of 2%. Lastly in 2020, proportion of adult residents was significantly increased upto half of total. However, other four groups became decreased, which represented proportion of children less than 20% and 15-24 was lowered to 10%. On other hand, couple of old age groups were shown little decrease with distinction of 5% respectively.
Overall, during all four eras, adults were on higher proportion in comparison to other four which represented little disturbance in count of population of Iceland.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | or | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | Hoang Thi Phung | view | |
| 2023-07-10 | Hoang Thi Phung | view | |
| 2022-11-28 | jena_03 | 67 | view |
- The chart shows information about the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage participation of men in senior development in three companies between 1980 and the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantage of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...sters were minimised with count of 15%. Likewise previous year, 55-64 and 64+ over group...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, likewise, second, similarly, so, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34979423868 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77801248818 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526748971193 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6225635824 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.8571428571 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3571428571 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111699241522 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485194717885 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869340817987 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125828671391 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127425512918 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.