Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In the recent days, there is a general consensus that it is essential for staffs to wear clothes that are majestic while others believe that the qualification of employees is much more important than their appearance. In this essay, I am going to discuss both point of views and explain why I am prone to to latter opinion.
On one hand, there are some reasons why individuals think that wearing smart clothes is beneficial. The first culprit is that this act can leave good impression in other's eyes. As clothes on behalf of the characteristic of people, dressing majestically means that they are discipline and serious person which not only help them be more trustworthy but also easy to attract customers. Another reason is that if all the staff wearing smartly , it would enhance the aesthetic of the company and create a grave atmosphere in which staff could pay more attention on working.
On the other hand, it is believed that qualification is much more crucial than appearance. First, people argue that we can not judge a book by its cover, there are many employees who do not emphasis on clothing but they have ability and experiences hence it is not equitable to appreciate those who dress smartly than those who not. The second reason is that staff have the right to wear which they want, depending on their income. This can foster the work satisfactory, thus improve the productivity of workers.
In conclusion, I believe that both opinions have their merits, however, I show preference to the view that qualification is appreciated than appearance because clothes do not present people' s ability and individuals have the right to wear anything that they can afford.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news by age group 2011 78
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 2000 Summaries the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
In the recent days, there is a general consensus that it is essential for staffs to wear...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...int of views and explain why I am prone to to latter opinion. On one hand, there are...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...is that if all the staff wearing smartly , it would enhance the aesthetic of the c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90175438596 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73265785357 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550877192982 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.1340774232 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13119956003 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521801017853 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261160412573 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881409364766 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023162975239 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.