The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The ilustrated chart showed UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. The data are measured in number of graduate students and number postgraduate students. Overall, it can be seen that data both graduate and postgraduate the further study were the highest in UK rather than the other.
According to the details, the further study of destination of UK graduates in 2008 was the highest category which was 29,665 number of graduate students. Following by working in part-time and unemployment were 17.735 and 16.235 number of graduate students and the last, the amount of voluntary work was the lowest number which was 3.500 students.
However, the number of post graduate students the further study was the highest number which was 2.725. Meanwhile, part-time work as a second high with the number of postgraduate which was 2.535. Whereas, the quantity of unemployment of destination of UK postgraduates which was 1.625 in 2008. Then, voluntary work the last position of number of postgraduate students which was 345 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-03 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Tran Kim Ngoc Anh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | rvw | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | quan12341234 | 73 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subject that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology 67
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and mak comparisons where relevant 73
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...number of postgraduate which was 2.535. Whereas, the quantity of unemployment of destin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24431818182 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8587564391 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465909090909 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8870119585 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250010736099 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143836512406 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177879331383 0.0843802449381 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212036357773 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147488196276 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.