The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010.
The pie charts provide information about the proportion of the electricity consumption in Eastern Australia divided by different sectors.
In general, there was the slight fluctuation in the data of 2007 and 2010. It was immuatably true that residental turned as the sector consuming the highest amount of electricity.
In 2007, electrecity consumption purpose for household made up more than quarter of total amount of electricity consumed with 28%. The figure of commercial came in the second with 23%. Meanwhile, the amount of electricity used for transport and agriculture was only 1% in both sector. In addition, there was the similar in percentage of electricity consumed for manufacturing and aluminium with 13%
After 3 years, there was the insignificant change in the figure of eight sectors. It could be manifest from the pie chart of 2010 that residental remained unchanged and continued to be the sector which consumed the highest amount of electricity with 28%. Meanwhile, the electricity consumption of manufacturing and aluminium stood at 9% and 11%. Moreover, the electricity consumed for manufacturing process of other metals experience the slight change from 12% in 2007 to 18% in 2010.
- The graph below shows the information of communication technology about percentages of people using different devices in the UK between 1998 and 2008
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in 1998 and 2005 73
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 73
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38947368421 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1185087707 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521052631579 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0719621601 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327144080518 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121076058598 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665276768858 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198162177822 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390943121523 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.