The education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries. However, educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important and
governments should spend more money on this. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
The education should give priority to teach illiterate people over the young generation. I agree with this viewpoint, however; I believe that educating adolescents is also crucial purpose that educationists should give concentration.
On the one hand, reducing the population’s illiteracy rate, especially the adults, who didn’t have full-educated when they were young, is the vitally important goal of a society in general and educationists in particular. It is immutably true that if illiterate adults can have an opportunity to join in methodical training programs about reading and writing, they will get the better jobs which can help them improve their life quality. Teaching adults who are not able to read and write is not only enhance their life value but also contribute to the social development. For instance, adults who are fully educated can support teachers in teaching the children at home, which can assist youngsters acquire the knowledge more efficiently.
However, education programs for young generations are also significantly important missions of nations. There will be the amount of serious consequence can happen if governments and educationists neglect to teach youngsters. One clear example is the shortage of human resource in area of mind use in various companies, which the state leaders have made enormous attempt to find the solutions. Therefore, it is indispensable to design appropriate curriculums for people from the earliest ages to reduce the illiteracy rate and serve the purpose of economic development.
To sum up, teaching illiterate adults and young generations should be given equal concentration and government should allocate the budget properly to resolve this significant problem.
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 87
- The graph below shows the information of communication technology about percentages of people using different devices in the UK between 1998 and 2008
- Some people think that school should teach the children to be a good person however others think that the teacher should teach them how to develop their career and make money To extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 73
- Task 1 The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in general, in particular, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60227272727 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09639803403 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621212121212 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4603265506 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.454545455 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226341513271 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859451550105 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526775429008 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136638328476 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429907414276 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.