some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstance of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people debate that there should be fixed and defined punishment for each kind of crime while, others discuss that motivations and context of each individual crime should be pondered. In my opinion, each case should be analyzed separately and the equivalent punishment regarding the context of crime must be delineated.
On the one hand, defining fixed punishment for certain crime could improve the transparency of judging and reduce the probability of corruption among the judges and juries. Immutable punishment makes the process of judging shorter and faster and take the pressure off lawyers and judges. Moreover, people know the exact consequence of their actions and in some contingencies, they can prioritize their reflects by considering their discerned fines.
On the other hand, judging disregarding the context could be unjust. Sometime, people are led to commit a crime and they do not have any control on what is going on. With this in mind, the people in this situation are not as guilty as who intentionally do something criminal. In addition, people could be manipulated and deceived by others who are the true delinquent ones. Children, for example, can be easily cheated to play a role in criminal activities and they do not even know that they are involved in actions against the law.
In conclusion, each case has its own story that should be considered before judging. Without gathering all the information, identifying the true culprit is out of question. Sometimes, some elements like the age of culprit, his mental status and the reason of committing the crime can affect the verdict
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-02-16 | sinanarimani | 67 | view |
2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 73 | view |
2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 61 | view |
2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 61 | view |
2020-08-26 | panizzf | 67 | view |
- nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 67
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think that is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mitting the crime can affect the verdict
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15209125475 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78378415745 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562737642586 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0188970784 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.230769231 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385255368873 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125065960565 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132387323792 0.0667982634062 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227254931194 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154783243071 0.056905535591 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mitting the crime can affect the verdict
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15209125475 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78378415745 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562737642586 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0188970784 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.230769231 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385255368873 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125065960565 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132387323792 0.0667982634062 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227254931194 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154783243071 0.056905535591 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.