People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
We live in an era where people judge us not only based on the number of unique skills we have gained but also on the degree to which we are good at them. As human beings, as we evolve, our needs evolve simultaneously. We have evolved from a species that only needed hunting and gathering skills to animals that have mastered their environment. Although some argue that knowing about many skills can help us throughout our lives, I think it is better to master one skill.
As human beings, we have mastered our environments. We have developed sophisticated infrastructure so much that we hardly ever face any problems in traveling or daily needs such as water or heating. Hence, we do not have to develop skills that have become redundant because of our well-developed infrastructure. Skills such as horse riding, shelter building, hunting from the wild, etc. are now irrelevant.
Besides that, the elevation of quality of life has resulted in people pursuing skills in which they are more interested. The range of skills that you might occasionally need has extremely widened. Since we cannot develop enough skills in most of them, you can ask others to do it for you. Hence, when you need a particular thing to be done requiring special skills, you can access to people who are better at them.
The more you are better at a particular thing, the more money you can make off of it. Developing an essential skill to the level of expertise so that people pay you for using them is another reason you should master one skill. By making more money from the skill you have grasped, you can hire well-skilled people for the tasks you need.
To conclude, it is not important how many skills one has learned, but how good they are at what they do. Although, there is a high possibility that in our lives, we stumble upon a situation where we wish we had gained skills to do certain tasks. Though we may wish we had those skills during most of our lives, doing a single task at an expert level is more desirable. There is a saying: “Jack of all trades, master of none!” So, we don’t have to be a “Jack of all trades,” but we have to be “master of one.”
- The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake s water what scientists call its salinity has been increasing steadily for years because the lake s water is evaporating faster than it is being replaced by rainfal 78
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 73
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 71
- Transient lunar phenomena TLP are relatively brief flashes of light that appear to come from the surface of the Moon Such flashes of light have been observed for centuries by both amateur and professional astronomers and several theories have been put for 82
- People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, may, so, well, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57731958763 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57364170569 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507731958763 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3865793769 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256132006945 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893128428985 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637851179307 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157952398816 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526695385937 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.