In many cities, an increasing number of people do not know their neighbors and there is a lack of a sense of community.
What are the causes of this problem?
How can it be solved?
Nowadays, there are more and more people who live in urban areas lack interaction with those next door and lost a sense of community probably because of some reasons behind this phenomenon.This essay will outline some major causes leading to problem and feasible solutions to deal with it.
There are two primary reasons why it is common for neighbors in metropolis areas to interact less. To begin with, people are mostly occupied with their own works. Because of the hectic pace of life, people devoted themselves to handling their workload at workplace in order to have a higher standard of living. Therefore, they do not have time to socialize with their surrounding relationships instead of taking care of their children and entertaining themselves. Furthermore, the rapid growth of social media, people tend to use the social networking sites such as Facebook or Instagram as the effective and convenient ways to communicate with others on daily basics. In fact, those who have exposure to online conversation for a long term are likely to get difficulties when communicating with other people in the real life. As a result, this could reduce the sense of community.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to prevent this problem. The first solution would be that individuals have to be aware of the problem and take the initiative to befriend with their neighbors by doing a favor when the next doors in need. Thus, this could strengthen their neighbor-ship. A second measure, the government should build more parks and children’s playgrounds in the living areas to let people socialize and know each other. Families who have children could encourage them to play in these places and strike up a friendship. In this way, it is helpful in meeting friends, bonding with family and neighbors.
In conclusion, while modern lifestyle and the advent of technology are two major factors causing the decrease in the sense of friendship in the community, practical solutions could be taken to tackle this problem by the government and individuals
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Nowadays more and more older people who are looking for work have to compete with younger people for the same jobs What problems do this cause What are some possible solutions 78
- Some people think that the main factors influencing a child s development these days are things such as television friends and music Others believe that the family still remains more important Discuss about opinions and give your give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the reasons') or simply say ''some reasons''.
Suggestion: some of the reasons; some reasons
... sense of community probably because of some of reasons behind this phenomenon. This essay wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 848, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ing with other people in the real life. Thus/ As a result/ Consequences, this could ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08059701493 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77403870028 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588059701493 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0102723823 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228184304237 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772078421245 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463216803559 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143065550344 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319228770361 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.