positive and negative effects of technology information through mass media.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people who believing that positive and negative effects of technology information through mass media. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that positive effects of technology can not only contribute to negative effects of technology information, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned propositioned is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverence. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of positive effects of technology information through mass media.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefit of positive effects of technology information are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-03 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | mohammadsabet | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | woutan | 88 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | woutan | 77 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | amolsharma44 | 80 | view |
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 56
- Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one's career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away? 77
- The means of communicating in society today s has changed greatly over the last ten years Give your opinion 77
- Some people think that schools should involve students in school management. Do you agree or disagree with this idea? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0862745098 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92871608927 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537254901961 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0779666558 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.909090909 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34721052229 0.242375264174 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143164226964 0.0925447433944 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.208724638762 0.071462118173 292% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222643589281 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589778174641 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.