Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?

Essay topics:

Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?

One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is colossal upsurge in number of people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. There is a widespread worry that this will not lead to myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.

There are number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that fast food wastage can not only contribute to healthy food wastage, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.

There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm potential benefit of reuse the food or giving food to animals or any organization. The primary one stems from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend, people have not only realised it gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions when it comes to today’s ever-changing lifestyle. Besides, its impact on giving food to needful people is far-reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many are against throwing food to corner the road.

In view of the arguments outline above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefit of again use the meal or to give the food to poor people are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88848920863 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7430198053 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571942446043 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.424044035 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303697795921 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104500309211 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941310109334 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173034550661 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568071226045 0.0609392437508 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.