With an increasing population communicating via the Internet and text messaging, face-to-face communication will become a thing of the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that many people prefer to choose the Internet and text messaging when communicating rather than face-to-face communication. While nobody can deny the benefits of communicating via the Internet and text messaging, I strongly believe that face-to-face communication will not be forgotten.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons why people choose the Internet and text messaging when communicating. Firstly, they provide things such as speed and convenience. The Internet and text messaging have worldwide coverage, so people can easily access and use them. This means people can be present at any time and anywhere as long as they have Internet access. For example, a Vietnamese person working in the US can connect with family through a video call app such as Facetime or Zoom without writing a letter or booking a plane back home to visit family, which can take weeks to arrive. Furthermore, at work, the Internet and text messaging will save a lot of money in management costs for companies. In the past, companies, especially multinational corporations, paid a lot of money for managers and activities. These days, all of these things are done through the Internet and text messaging. For example, when a notice is sent via the Internet, the corporation only needs to post on the website and employees can easily follow it. The company will not waste money and time for sending each document to the branches.
On the other hand, I believe that face-to-face communication can not be forgotten for some reasons. Firstly, soft skills and human interaction are developed when talking face to face. Skills such as listening and speaking are better developed than done on the Internet. For example, the children will develop those skills by talking face to face with foreigners even though there are a lot of videos on the Internet. Secondly, it is a matter of security. The Internet and text messaging today have a lot of bugs relating to user security. Instead, meeting face-to-face will ensure greater security. For example, political information should be kept confidential. Despite modern technology, the heads of state always keep face-to-face meetings to avoid information leaks and errors.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that face-to-face communication can not be forgotten.
- Some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 89
- Many people think good planning is a key factor for life success Others think other factors are more important hard working luck etc Discuss both views and give your opinion 71
- 2 With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas Surroundings 73
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20052770449 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96113462001 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511873350923 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3441804051 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5909090909 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2272727273 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328657415772 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106090065255 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088239069264 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243590615961 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980903191789 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.