A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, people judge a person based upon social status and worldly possessions. There is not much importance to traditional values such as honour, kindness or trust. I strongly oppose this trend and disagree that this should be the criteria to judge someone's worth, and this essay attempts to discuss the same.
Many people believe that we live in today's materialistic and pop culture era when the public judges each individual based on their social status and wealth. Celebrities have become famous for their looks and wealth. One example would be Paris Hilton. Despite many disadvantages, many people still love her because she inherited her parents’ property. Other stars are well known for their social status as the son or daughter of a wealthy family.
Although traditional values such as respect for others have been forgotten, they still play an essential role in many communities. For example, employers still evaluate potential employees based on their hard work, positive behaviour, and integrity. Businesspeople are still looking for reliable, trustworthy, and trustworthy business partners. Therefore, adults need to educate their children about these positive
values as they still play a vital role in society.
In conclusion, while it is a commonplace for people to hold a higher value of material possessions and social status in this overcritical world, some people value old-fashioned values more and can not be overlooked by others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-04 | tsln7607 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | ThanhNT | 89 | view |
- One of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 100
- The pie charts below show the different reasons for flight delays in a particular Asian country in 2015 and 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 228.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4298245614 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85810150782 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644736842105 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3816174564 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2307692308 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209592749672 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734395929982 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802958832368 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124749359366 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109315884458 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.