Some people claim that it is immoral to exploit animals, and that the government should prohibit using animals for scientific research. In the meantime, others argue that exploiting animals is crucial for allowing scientists to learn more about human biology and health. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Nowadays, the best way to trial precise medicine is through trial in an animal body. However, it is argued that exploiting animals is immoral. In my opinion, I completely agree with this issue, and this essay will take a look at the reasons for the unethical exploiting animals.
To begin with, researchers get some animals out of natural habitats and lock them up in cage. They want to do experiment with them, but this action may make them exhausted because of the lack of food and water, not only so, but they are also not lived freely in their habitats, they have to suffer the sting of medicines. Moreover, researchers do not have enough painkillers to help them prevent injuries. According to the statistics, in 2006, nearly one hundred thousand animals are not used painkillers, such as hamsters, and rabbits, etc. Thus, the number of mice and hamsters is exploited as well as the loss natural habitat that they live and maintain.
Secondly, some researchers believe that animals are the most efficacious method to trial medicines because their genes are similar to other species' genes and human genes. Nevertheless, although some chemicals may be beneficial in animals, those chemicals injected into human body are likely to cause injury if chemicals that at a high dose. For example, a sleeping medicine - " thalidomide" leads to the serve disability, especially the children. In contrast, a few chemicals are effective in curing human, yet they can bring about the toxic to animals, like vitamin D injected vein, this medicine has an impact on mice's health.
In conclusion, it is claimed that the government needs to prohibit the unethical exploiting animals to do research. Instead of exploiting them, people need to drop them into their natural habitat and keep their natural balance. In addition, researchers should not too believe the experiment through trialing medicines with animals, perhaps they feel hurt due to the effect of the drug, and some drugs cause harm to both animals and human.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-17 | staytogether | 84 | view |
- Some people think that there should be more focus on disease prevention These people believe that money needs to be spent on public education about preventable diseases such as diabetes rather than on curing people who already have these diseases Do you a 61
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 56
- Some people claim that it is immoral to exploit animals and that the government should prohibit using animals for scientific research In the meantime others argue that exploiting animals is crucial for allowing scientists to learn more about human biology 84
- Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public or should a charge even a voluntary charge be levied for admittance Discuss this issue and give your opinion You should write at least 250 words 73
- Prevention is better than cure Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for the unethical exploiting animals. To begin with, researchers get some anim...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l habitat that they live and maintain. Secondly, some researchers believe that ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dicine has an impact on mices health. In conclusion, it is claimed that the go...
^^^
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to believe'?
Suggestion: to believe
...ce. In addition, researchers should not too believe the experiment through trialing medicin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06606606607 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70652224235 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57957957958 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2393433015 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.466666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0666666667 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267904911935 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100626861482 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890930743774 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167151521812 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569711835944 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.