Many people put their personal information online (address, telephone number, and so on) for purposes such as signing up for social networks or online banking. Is this a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, more people tend to register for a social network or banking account by providing their personal information online. Although there are many benefits to doing this, I strongly believe that the merits are outweighed by its drawbacks.
On the one hand, technology is making things more accessible. Firstly, it makes signing up for an account more convenient for users. For instance, instead of going to the bank and completing paperwork to open up a stock account as before, now people can stay at home and provide their information online, which helps them save much time doing these registrations. Secondly, for those who are often absent-minded, putting their information online is a good option to remember several kinds of passwords or answers to security questions. In other words, they just need to provide their phone numbers or email address to get themselves verified. It is especially lucrative in case of an emergency.
On the other hand, there are multiple downsides of putting personal information on social platforms. First and foremost, the users could become a target for physical and identity theft. To illustrate, if people post their address on social media, the thefts could acquire it and then easily break into their houses. Even worse, the criminals could impersonate them to claim insurance. Another disadvantage of putting personal information online is that people are prone to receive more distracting commercial advertisements. It is reported that most social media companies, including Facebook and Tiktok, make a profit by collecting their users’ data and then selling it to telesales people.
In conclusion, despite the convenience that putting information online brings, people should be alert as it is currently doing more harm than good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | Nina Tsarevich | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | Nina Tsarevich | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-16 | Meomeo11 | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-22 | yennguyen189 | 78 | view |
- Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends This has a negative effect on their social lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than to benefit children as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 You should write at least 150 words 84
- The table and bar chart show how journey times in a city centre changed after improvements were made to the transport network and the costs of using different forms of transport in the city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 78
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erits are outweighed by its drawbacks. On the one hand, technology is making th...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly lucrative in case of an emergency. On the other hand, there are multiple do...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d then selling it to telesales people. In conclusion, despite the convenience t...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s currently doing more harm than good.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4128113879 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86005447534 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2534537245 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376219247032 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108152965398 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792661006891 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214811099261 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517117391566 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.