Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people like to know about different countries, and, for this purpose, they decide to visit the museums of that country and believe that this is the best way. In contrast, in my opinion, although visiting museums can give people quite a lot of information about a country, it is not the best way to learn about the country and has several disadvantages. My reasons are as follows.
To begin with, one cannot find everything in museums. In this regard, it is important to say that museums usually do not keep all things about their country because there are quite a few ancient things which have missed, and no one has data about them; therefore, people cannot gain all information about a country by visiting museums, so museums need some complementary sources such as research papers and history books, to name but two. Moreover, when a person visits a museum, he or she needs some additional explanation and analysis about whatever they see in a museum because visiting objects without enough information about them cannot help people to understand different aspects of a country. I remember that my brother and I traveled to Istanbul, Turkey, seven years ago, and we visited the Topkapi museum, which is one of the most famous places in this country; unfortunately, we could not understand completely that place and its objects because we just visited museum objects without any information.
Secondly, every country has different aspects, and, in most cases, people can only find historical objects in the museums; therefore, museums usually can help people to gain information about the history of a country. In this regard, when a person wants to learn about a country, he or she should search and study various aspects of that country such as geography and politics, to name but two. In addition, when one wants to learn about a country, he or she should notice that there are mutual relationships among all different aspects of the country. In other words, if a person studies the history of a country, he or she should read about geography and other aspects which are connected to history; for example, one reads that England has had a powerful navy, which can make a question in his or her mind 'why navy is so important for Britain?'; in this case, geography can help that readers because when he or she understands that England is an island, they can find a rational solution to their question.
To sum up, with all this taken into account, visiting museums is a proper way to get information about a country, but this has some disadvantages that do not let me say ‘’the best way’’; In this respect, my reasons are museums do not have everything and museums mostly give information about the history of a country. It is better to say that visiting museums is one of the best ways to know about a country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 90 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | porteghale Abiasli | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-13 | madgal | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Hoda95 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | mrhj75 | 90 | view |
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 45
- Question It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with that idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g all different aspects of the country. In other words, if a person studies the hi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in contrast, such as, in most cases, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2344.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80327868852 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6348220091 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.415983606557 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 122.569386218 48.9658058833 250% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 180.307692308 100.406767564 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5384615385 20.6045352989 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0769230769 5.45110844103 240% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229190745881 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114202673142 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712961518681 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18722148888 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796754759038 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 11.7677419355 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 58.1214874552 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.1575268817 162% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.