The map show a beautiful beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today.
The illustration details the changes that occurred in a beachfront area in Australia from 1950 until nowadays.
A closer look at the map highlights one area where the playground was destroyed in 1950 and now the place has a new restaurant and many surf clubs.
In 1950, a playground were located to the northwest of the beach. Nevertheless, at present, it is replaced by a car park for tourists. Directly below this was a 25m pool which is then broadened to a 50m one. To the right of the beachfront, the street used to end with another car park, now extends longer to the light house at the south east.
At present, to the left and the right of the beach, two surf clubs have been established for entertainment to attract more visitors. At the right hand of the 50m pool, new restaurant has been added. In addition, dining tables, pavilion, and many other remain unchanged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-13 | lethianhthu | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | mylinh3001 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | hanbnguyenle | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | NajlaM | view |
- The map show a beautiful beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 56
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain But other say film should have educational value Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- The maps below show the changes to an art gallery floor plan in 2005 and the present day
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, nevertheless, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62820512821 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71007567988 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4805734913 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2222222222 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151452180086 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601060577922 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890465644609 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118123159654 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103569158915 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.