Today's school should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is said that students should be taught by schools about financial survival in modern life. I agree with this point of view to some extent.
I can understand why some believe that school students should be educated about financial issues in an academic space. In the contemporary age, financial management is one of the most important activities in the daily lives of people. If individuals can be able to be in a good financial status, they can ensure a good quality of life for their families. To make this happen, people should learn from an early age how to manage their money. Educational institutions can academically increase the financial knowledge of children through some courses, such as math. Such lessons help children learn how to count or calculate numbers. In this way, children can know about the basic functions related to one of the practical skills for their survival in their adult lives.
However, we have to consider that school students are not mature enough, and they may find it difficult to understand subjects associated with finance at school. This is because the school curriculum always is full, and Teachers do not have enough time to simplify and illustrate the practical application of the financial content for students. Therefore, parents can also play a positive role in this subject, as they are role models for their children and can show them how to spend their money in real life. Adults can support their kids to apply what they have learned at school about finance in routine activities. For example, fathers can take their children to the bank to open a bank account to save their money or mothers can buy a piggy bank to guide their children to put their money there in order not to waste it. Also, some parents make this situation more informative for their children by allowing them to calculate the amount of money that must be paid for purchases. In this way, money management skills from the academic status are turned into practical ones for young individuals, which can prepare them for their adult working lives.
In conclusion, in my view, training of students in money management is the responsibility of both schools and parents, as they complement each other. No one can cope with this duty alone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | Sherzodbek25 | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-04 | Nguyễn Ninh | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | ulligadda sreeja | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | ojehparvaz | 73 | view |
- Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes Should these new homes be constructed in existing cities or should new towns be built in the countryside 73
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 83
- In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main type of rubbish They cause water and land pollution so they should be banned To what extent do you agree 73
- Some people view teenage conflict with their parents as a necessary part of growing up whilst others see it as something negative which should be avoided Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.890625 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56858504303 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5078125 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1239718942 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189701339714 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725691716621 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472143965491 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140592973519 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660548509736 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.