Some people believe that women should be treated as equal to men when applying for a job with the police or the military. Others think that women are less suitable for this kind of job.
Gender equality is one of the biggest problem concerns in society. Although it can be argued that women are less capable of doing the jobs such as police and military, I believe that gender should not be the barrier when opting for a job and that women should be given equal importance as men.
Some people assume that women are not appropriate to carry out several jobs because of the misconception derive from the past. A long time ago, the families who had a daughter always educated their children that they had to be skilled in cooking, and doing housework for only one aim, which was the marriage portion of their daughter's husband. In the other words, becoming a housewife may be the most suitable job for women in this epoch. Furthermore, people believe that physical strength plays a crucial role to become a police or military. To illustrate, while catching a thief, running fast is necessary to keep up with the burglar.
By contrast, I would side with those who suppose that women should be given equally to men in any field. Women should be given opportunities to showcase their talents in Olympics competitions or national defense. For instance, a majority of games in the Olympics such as shooting, and wrestling are played by women who have won medals in their respective fields. Therefore, women should be treated equally to men, even if the job application is for defending the country.
In conclusion, while the idea that women are less suitable than men in the field is probably right in some cases, I completely agree with those who consider that women should be given opportunities to prove, they can do things men can do.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-07 | tsln7607 | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-26 | vananhxh2005 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-07 | vinay_vp372 | 72 | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 73
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 73
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting aand reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.625 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43774482389 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.6835449142 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21172621067 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108203325415 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386249394612 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15164168379 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272268700291 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.