When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
It is undeniable that working on projects is a good way to apply what students learn in a class room. According to the way these projects have to be, I think students learn much more effectively if their teachers ask them to work together in a group than if they work alone. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, students in group have different skills, that will make them benefit from each other, and have better project at the end. For instance, when I was at school, I used to be good in making abstracts, and listing points from long articles. In response, I had very bad computer skills, so when I was looking for a partner to help me in the historical class's project, I was trying to find someone who is excellent in technology. My friend Sara was the best choice for me. We worked on this project together. She teached me how to deal with computers, and I explained details of Chinese history for her. At the end of the semester, our project got the highest mark, I had essential information about computer, and sara memorized all important points in our book.
Second, if a student works by himself on a project, it will be hard for him to figure out what mistakes he does, but with a partner, they can fix their faults before the presentation day. For example, when my brother Sami was doing his graduation project, he had many mistakes that he did not recognize. Therefore, he failed his first try, and his professor asked him to do it again. He was very sad because he spent three months working on it. It was impossible for him to start from the beginning. He decided that it would be better if he fix the old one. He started working with his new partner John, who was able to see what was going wrong in the old project. They solved them on six days only, and they passed. Nowadays, they are preparing to attend their graduation cermony.
In conclusion, I strongely believe that working in groups for a project makes learning more effective for students. It builds up a new skill for them and helps them to discover issues in their work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- colonization on asteroids 81
- An international organization has started issuing certifications to wood companies who meet a high ecological standard by conserving resources and recycling materials in an effort to encourage ecological sustainable forestry practices Certified companies 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Online graduate degree programs are being offered worldwide In many respects the programs are like the same degree programs available in a traditional campus environment but in several key aspects they are very different First online degree programs do no 80
- Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Other think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you support and why 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'fixes'.
Suggestion: fixes
...e decided that it would be better if he fix the old one. He started working with hi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45478036176 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45650694074 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550387596899 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 24.0 9.59856630824 250% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.582896502 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0952380952 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314119916591 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952152230264 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109768962136 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220172532062 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120569315546 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 58.1214874552 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.