Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible
The above argument is that some people believe corporations operating in particular place have a responsibility to promote social and environmental well being and while others agree the only responsibility is to make more profit. I agree with the former belief. In the following paragraphs I would like to present reasons for my belief.
Firstly, the corporations in a particular place are the result of a unique environmental and social structure favorable for them to flourish. For example, consider a company that operates by exporting the fish harvested from the ocean or farms near other water bodies, had the location and natural elements been not favorable it would have been impossible for the company to grow over time. Also the local labor force plays a crucial rule in daily operations, so to ensure the welfare of the people and the immediate enivornment is critical. If for example the company keeps on overfishing without caring for the environmental impact they may soon run out of fish and the long term sustainability of the corporation will be at stake.
Secondly, imagine a company that operates in niche domains for example the swiss watch manufacturing industry. It is crucial that in order to maintain their monopoly and brand image they regularly look after the social welfare of the employees and the people in the vicinity of that location. If the company is unable to retain the talent and local population workforce it may see an effect on quality of products and eventual decline in market share.
Thirdly, look after industries that are in the food processing business. For instance consider the region in France famous for its wine production. For centuries the symbiotic relationship between the farmers who grow the grapes and the industry that processes them has been beneficial to both. If the corporation does not ensure social and environmental well being of the region it may result in decrease in quality of grapes or the migration of new generation to different lucrative careers which may result in loss for both the industry and the local population.
Thus, on the basis of the above highlighted issues it may be beneficial for the corporation to look after the social and environmental welfare of the region in which it operates. As a result you would see many corporations operating their Corporate Social Responsibility division as an independent entity to serve such kind of concerns.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-11 | rookobay | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Ifthekhar | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Dinesh4518 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Dinesh4518 | 67 | view |
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 92
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 83
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 66
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...like to present reasons for my belief. Firstly, the corporations in a particula...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 435, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ible for the company to grow over time. Also the local labor force plays a crucial r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y of the corporation will be at stake. Secondly, imagine a company that operate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and eventual decline in market share. Thirdly, look after industries that are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he industry and the local population. Thus, on the basis of the above highligh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in particular, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92758859815 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8419954582 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.21951772744 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235284542472 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715448169133 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111845296151 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147161466022 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104059623151 0.0667264976115 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.