The graph shows information about types of accommodation of people on holiday in the UK 1985, 1995 and 2005
The pie charts show four kinds of accommodation chosen by holidaymakers in the UK in three years, namely 1985, 1995, and 2005
In general, there were noticeable changes in the proportion of people staying at staying with relatives, hotels, and caravans, while a constant trend can be seen if we look at the figure for camping. It is also clear that the figure for staying with relatives was the highest among five types in 1985 and 1995; however, that for hotels was larger than any other in 2005.
At the beginning of the period, 55% of people staying with relatives was recorded, compared to only 16% at hotels. Over the following 10 years, the percentage of people staying with relatives decreased sharply, to 35%, before dropping to 30% in 2005. In addition, The UK saw the proportion of people who stayed at hotels increase significantly, to 37% in 2005.
In 1985, The percentage of people going camping stood at 19%, while the figure for caravans was lower, at 10% respectively. After 10 years, the figure for camping fell to 12% but rose to 19% in 2005. Furthermore, caravans followed the opposite trend to that of camping, with figures decreasing to 14% on 2005
- The charts below show the percentage of working time in office spent on different tasks in the UK 1990 and 2000 67
- Today fewer elderly people live with their children than in the past Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 67
- Some people think the increasing use of technology in the workplace is good for young people s prospects of gaining jobs and harder for old people To what extent do you agree or disagree 49
- the maps below show the changes of the community centre 10 years ago and at present 73
- The pie chart below shows information about different types of pollutants entering in a particular area of ocean in 1997 and 2007 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77832512315 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65614557598 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56157635468 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8834686332 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199713596722 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09195979402 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511617197528 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148933559291 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831519453618 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.