Professor show on the television
The author and the lecturer talk about university professors' programs on the television show. In the passage, the author states the advantages of teachers on TV channels. While The lecturer in the listening passage opposes the author and mentions the disadvantage.
Firstly, The Author states that when professors do shows on a broadcasting channel, their reputation increase in their academic field. Further, the passage includes an example to support the statement that If a university professor, releases an article then it will only be known among the scholar, but when a professor appears on the television and then published a paper, the idea will be known to many people. But, The lecturer opposes it by saying that such kind of behavior will not be considered by other fellow professors of the university. They consider that publicity is for entertainment purposes.
Secondly, The lecturer mentions another disadvantage by stating that the involvement of professors in the shows will only make the professors busy. Professor will not be able to give time for the preparation of speeches, presentation and has to go for travel.
Further, When the passage state that when professors' shows will be broadcast then it will help the audience to learn deep about the topic. But, the lecturer refutes this by stating that Television show does not broadcast serious topic. They have discussions either on the background of the current affair or movies related to history. Lastly, she states that this kind of show can be done by, even the reporters, for this professor will not have a huge impact.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 75 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | nilav | 71 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, while, as to, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15325670498 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80871397781 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501915708812 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3967051646 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.461538462 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365340256836 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138209151418 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127993632819 0.0662205650399 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248337278982 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152794864007 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.