The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is known that political, cultural, and scientifical aspects are important ways to measure the greatness of a nation. Using these parameters is one of right approaches to assess if a nation is a leading authority worldwide. However, the surest indicator that represent the importance of a nation is the general wellbeing of its people. Therefore, I agree with the given statement, since indeed the general welfare of people represent the standard of life of the country as well as the economic and social development.
The people’s well-being can be measure by social indicators such as education, income and health indicators. These indicators are utilized to measure the development status of all nations around the world. Because they depict the lifestyle and conditions besides the correlated behaviors. For example, in a small and very poor country in Africa continent although it may has important artists that represent very well their culture worldwide, what will represent the greatness of this nation will be the education level, the income distribution of its residents, the access to sanitation and clean water.
Furthermore, the United States is a great example of why the greatness of nation is best measure by people’s wellness. For instance, the American dream represents that people all around the world see the greatness of United States based on indicators that they will have best conditions of education and better salaries and job opportunities. In other words, they believe that there they will guarantee better life conditions for their beloved ones. They assume this based on social indicators or the general welfare of American people.
Many people may argue that the achievements of politicians, scientists or artists best represents the greatness of a nation, because culture, politics and technological development are very important to the overall development of a nation. For instance, Brazil may be known by carnival, Japan may be known by it robots and technological advances, North Corea may be known by its authoritarian government. However, I believe that these are general indicators that help us just to know superficially about a nation. Therefore, I strongly believe that the surest indicator that best represent the greatness of a nation is its people well-being.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-05-01 | student193044 | 50 | view |
2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
2023-10-20 | Jhon Kwame | 50 | view |
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 66
- Explain why you want to do the voluntary work.State what your skills and experience are.Indicate where you would like to volunteer and for how long. 78
- A new neighbour has moved in, who lives above you, are making a lot of noise and this is disturbing you.Write a letter to your landlord. In your letter:Explain what the problem isExplain why it is disturbing you so muchTell your landlord what you would li 73
- You rent an apartment and recently a new neighbour has moved in who lives above you. They are making a lot of noise and this is disturbing you.Write a letter to your landlord. In your letter:Explain what the problem isExplain why it is disturbing you so m 73
- Your local public library wants to make improvements to their services and facilities. In order to get ideas from the public, they have asked library users to send them suggestions in writing.Write a letter to the librarian in your letter-describe what yo 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37912087912 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99988930279 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458791208791 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1342814959 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.375 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260097274025 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967042201961 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764150403464 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171949467228 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596283772913 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.