Rome
Historians are looking for an accurate answer of do Rome’s military, the power of its leaders, and it’s prosperity really make it a successful country. According to the passage, they are the key reasons that make Rome flourish. But the lecture proves that they also let Rome face doom while helping it to be affluent and powerful.
The lecture states that a mighty military may benefits or help to protect Rome, but it also damage Rome, which is partially opposite to the statement in passage. The soldiers were actually not all from Rome; most of them were from the enemy country that they overcome. So people couldn’t depend on them, because sometime they are not loyal; they may can be treacherous. Some time they will turn against Rome.
Contrary to great power can make Rome successful in the passage, the lecture confirms that it has also harm Rome when also helping Rome years ago . Emperors right now may make poor decisions, which can cause Rome to lose conquered places, and it can hurt it. ( Poor decisions include things like building palaces other than administrating the country. ) Since the emperor had so much power, it was impossible to let other people to give suggestions at that time.
After confirming the first two thoughts wrong, the lecture begin to challenge the last one is not totally right. Although wealth had made Rome thrive, it also hurt Rome. As time past, the taxes became higher and higher. Emperors were getting new farmlands. In order to farm in the places, they ought to pay taxes. Then, the wealth stopped growing for residents; emperors were becoming wealthier. Gradually, citizens were having a mutiny. They even asked help from Rome’s foes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-16 | degew59415@eryod.com | 75 | view |
| 2024-04-16 | degew59415@eryod.com | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | 83 | view |
- franchise 3
- Mars 70
- Archaeologists have been wondering about the function of the shafts in the Great Pyramid which was built for an ancient Egyptian king The passage believes that the shafts are used for ventilation for religious reasons and as the passageways for the king s 75
- Robert E Peary was a well known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole When he returned from the expedition he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7 1909 This report made him into an international celebrity Though 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Boys and girls should attend separate schools Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'damages'?
Suggestion: damages
...ts or help to protect Rome, but it also damage Rome, which is partially opposite to th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'harmed'.
Suggestion: harmed
..., the lecture confirms that it has also harm Rome when also helping Rome years ago ....
^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rm Rome when also helping Rome years ago . Emperors right now may make poor decisi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, look, may, really, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93333333333 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40513697066 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0549013385 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435475989356 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1472289624 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159595137121 0.0662205650399 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300598994769 0.162205337803 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341454157841 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'damages'?
Suggestion: damages
...ts or help to protect Rome, but it also damage Rome, which is partially opposite to th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'harmed'.
Suggestion: harmed
..., the lecture confirms that it has also harm Rome when also helping Rome years ago ....
^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rm Rome when also helping Rome years ago . Emperors right now may make poor decisi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, look, may, really, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93333333333 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40513697066 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0549013385 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435475989356 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1472289624 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159595137121 0.0662205650399 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300598994769 0.162205337803 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341454157841 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.