Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the two maps depicting the development of the Felixstone throughout the period of time, commencing from 1967 to 2001.
Perceptibly, this area had totally transformed by adding multiple accommodation and entertainment services. Heading north, there were no changes in position through 34 years with the golf course kept remained in the west and next to it were the apartment and shop services. To be accurate, they both have built three more compared to the old numbers of 5, which can transport between them by high street. Moreover, the famland had removed drastically and replaced by the complex quarter in the south east, which contained a hotel beside the swimming pool and in front of the two tennis courts.
Moving south, the natural area of dunes and trees still preserve, but there are have a new appearance of wind tubines to the west. In addition, the hotel was demolished to give way to the car park by narrow and move up a bit and on the righ-hand side, the cafe had witnessed changes by the position. Moreover, to fully exploit the sea in Felixstone, they had knocked out all the marina, pier and fish market to extend towar the public and private beach for tourist benefits.Notwithstanding the transformation of this region, the orginal large sea have been kept.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 11
- Some people think that people should be given the right to use freshwater as they like Others believe governments should strictly control the use of freshwater Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think that people should be given the right to use freshwater as they like Others believe governments should strictly control the use of freshwater Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...opment of the Felixstone throughout the period of time, commencing from 1967 to 2001. Percept...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 322, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'compared' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
...curate, they both have built three more compared to the old numbers of 5, which can tran...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...and trees still preserve, but there are have a new appearance of wind tubines to the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Notwithstanding
... and private beach for tourist benefits.Notwithstanding the transformation of this region, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, still, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8904109589 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92828312483 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657534246575 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1519230369 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.875 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.