In the past people liked to store knowledge in books. However, in the present, we prefer to store knowledge on the Internet. Do you think it is a positive or a negative trend?
In this contemporary epoch, it is apparent that the advent of “Cloud Database” has been altering the way people accumulate information over the past few years. This results in an emerging phenomenon that instead of saving knowledge in books, they tend to keep it on technological libraries. From my perspective, this brings both positive and negative impacts on the accessiblity and individuals.
On the one hand, there is no denying the fact that we can derive plenty of benefits from storing resources online. To commence with, users are allowed to reserve a great deal of information on an unprecedented scale. It is possible for people to save data in larger quantities since books can be downloaded straightforwardly to compact portable devices. This also means less space is required, let alone the external factors such as weather or termites which prompts adverse influences in actual area, are no longer problematic. Furthermore, entering virtual knowledge is time-saving with the assist of cutting-edge technology. Looking for relevant materials is much more effortless nowadays on the ground of exploring with a few keywords in numerous digital user-friendly platforms, instead of following complicated directions just to get a piece of information in a book.
On the other hand, there are also some repercussions stem from archiving information on the Internet. First and foremost, users are at serious risk of being attacked by hackers and viruses. Although privacy regulations are introduced, it is doubtful whether cyber-crackers are able to steal them by any means. Hence, the likelihood of information vanishment is conspicuous to those whose majority of articles are reversed in cyberspace. In addition, spending great amount of time sticking our eyes on the screen prompts detrimental impacts on our health including optic and mental issues. If people made the best use of online books, the trigger of eyeshortedness, fatigue and obesity would be so hazardous that no measures can be taken to alleviate them.
In conclusion, considering the aforementioned points, I strongly affirm that the shift of information storage method to internet-based is a positive trend. However, it is advisable for everyone to weigh up the pros and cons as well as have a proper-and-radical usage of networked database.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-24 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 89
- Causes and solutions to global warming 89
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 78
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricans and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42307692308 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26368076321 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64010989011 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3947427055 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.117647059 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127962243364 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334889756893 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335857390013 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692780291489 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308453521433 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.