To succeed in a business, one needs to be good at maths. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is supposed by some advocates that should a person want to achieve an outstanding career, they need to excel at Mathematics. From my personal standpoint, I would take a dim view with this opinion due to the following rationales.
First and foremost, we should all acknowledge Maths as a mere subject that exists in every school curriculum around the world. Even when the initiative for taking Mathematics lessons is to enhance the young’s cognitive ability, neither it can have any influence on a person’s performance levels nor task achievements. It is proved by a majority of top-tier scientists that a pupil being gifted at Maths but underperforms in other subjects turns out to exhibit disappointing behaviours during the later life. Moreover, the digital age has given human the ability to make use of computers and machines for calculation-related activities, hence, there is no need to deal with sophisticated figures.
Secondly, it is undeniable that running a business is never a piece of cake in view of the fact that a successful business man is a combination of various skills and a great depth of theoretical knowledge. There are indispensable traits that one need to possess so as to be successful, time managements skills, diligence, cooperation capabilities, effective communications, high productivity, superb working performance, to name a few. That is to say, a CEO do not necessarily have to excel at Maths in order to achieve prosperous outcome, instead, people had better shift their focus on improving other aspects with the aim of reaching the top position.
In a nutshell, I would not take side with the view that a person should be good at Math so as to have a flourish career since there are other crucial factors in determining one’s achievements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 78
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 11
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment D 84
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ensable traits that one need to possess so as to be successful, time managements skills,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ew that a person should be good at Math so as to have a flourish career since there are ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1228668942 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25483841978 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641638225256 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.7033168182 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.1 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190061882574 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643898045536 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476120368724 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112507029312 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477969122685 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.