The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The table indicates how much five different nations' citizens spent on a variety of goods in the year 2002.
An initial inspection of the chart reveals the domination of food, drinks, or tobacco in the whole year's spending of every country. Among all, Turkish people had the highest total expense, while the Swedish possessed the lowest.
In more detail, it is apparent that every mentioned country had a significant expenditure on food, drinks, and tobacco. While Turkey's residents spent nearly one-third of their money on eating, drinking, and smoking, the identical figure in Sweden halved to over 15%.
Compared to the budget for food, drinks, and tobacco, people in five nations expended virtually less on fashion and education. The highest amount spent on clothing and footwear owned by the Italians, while the same data on leisure and education was possessed by the Turkish. One more time, the lowest proportion of money allocated for fashion was by the Swedish, with over 5%. By comparison, under 2% of the Spanish's money was paid for relaxation and studying.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2022-08-03 | rachell | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | nhattram39 | 11 | view |
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years 78
- Young people who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- More and more people no longer read newspaper or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14857142857 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54432702301 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622857142857 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.0701356731 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0714494911737 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310030167726 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479237009868 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0559438023126 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604461428361 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.