Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
These days, living in advance in technology, people could easy to access business meetings, discussions, and training by means of using their technology devices, such as computers or smartphones. From my perspective, I believe that the benefits would outweigh the disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are numerous reasons why it brings negative aspects to the citizens. One reason for this could be that it could take a huge amount of time for all participants to familiar with the new software. In fact, for those who are low-tech, it would be more difficult to them could access the new applications used for meetings. To take my mom as an older generation is a demonstration, she has rarely used these technology devices. Thus, she tends to deal with a number of troubles. Another reason for the use of devices to attend meetings could be that it is more dependent on the internet, if the internet is obstructed, the residents could not access meetings, which causes them to cope with numerous demerits, such as they will not knowing what will the company do in the next time and reduce their productivity.
On the other hand, the use of a smartphone to attend meetings or discussions has an abundance of benefits. In the first place, Instead of going to the workplace, they are still at home that could access meetings, which contributes to saving a huge amount of their time and avoiding traffic congestion. In fact, modern views have broken barriers, during the spread of covid 19, social distancing was in place, by using smartphones, people in the world still have meetings or discussions with their co-workers and directors.
In conclusion, technology is an indispensable part of human life, people become living more convenient and I believe that the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | nhinhi999 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-09 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | david_johnson265 | 74 | view |
- Some people prefer to live in small family units while others think it is better to live in large family groups Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies how does competitiveness affect individuals is it a positive or negative trend 61
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems Others however believe technology is the way to solve these problems Discuss both views and give you 78
- The pie charts show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 61
- Sending criminals to prison is not a good method of dealing with them Education and job training are better ways to help them To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'know'
Suggestion: know
...umerous demerits, such as they will not knowing what will the company do in the next ti...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...with their co-workers and directors. In conclusion, technology is an indispensa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, thus, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0297029703 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92193112358 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531353135314 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.545800612 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0851988718539 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319523852806 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034132203603 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0614094220593 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240968101868 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.