The population of many cities is growing rapidly. What are the effects on people living in these cities? What can be done to maintain the quality of life of these people?
It is undeniable that many metropolitans are experiencing many problems caused by the rapidly increasing number of citizens. This problem creates adverse impacts on city residents and should be addressed by taking the following solutions.
Overpopulation in urban areas has negative impacts on the quality of life for anyone living there. One of the obvious effects is that it worsens the traffic congestion and raises incidents on any roads. For example, people living in Ho Chi Minh City have to waste too much time traveling during peak hours which leads to being late for work or reducing the level of productivity. Another undesirable impact is the air and noise population stemming from this trend. The more people living and working in big cities, the more gas emissions released by vehicles. Polluted air may pose several threats for citizens’ health such as respiratory diseases, headaches or serious mental health.
To tackle the extended population in large cities, the government and urban policymakers should take responsibility. One of the notable ways to solve this issue is that the government should apply immigration policies to mitigate the trend. For instance, the national governments can subsidize people who choose to live and work in the countryside and provide cutting-edge technologies to develop the economy in rural areas. Another solution can be implemented is that policymakers and authorities should diversify the means of transportation to alleviate the traffic jams in rush hours and construct more trees to mitigate toxic gas emissions. And to curb the detrimental health effects on urban residents, better healthcare should be applied.
To sum up, overpopulation is happening rapidly in big cities leading to negative impacts on social and individual levels, particularly on people living here and several remedies should be taken to mitigate this issue.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-25 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
2023-10-09 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
2023-03-28 | thaoduong1902 | 78 | view |
2023-03-28 | thaoduong1902 | 56 | view |
2023-01-14 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks 78
- Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 84
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks 78
- Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 89
- The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are the effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of these people 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45084745763 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98867728249 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586440677966 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8430060976 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.857142857 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213083739483 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664095551674 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445748093437 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131410087238 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250610043041 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.