Many people believe that good planning is a key factor to success in life, while others believe that other factors like hard work or luck are important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this contemporary epoch, it is apparent that achievements are crucial with a view to pursue a successful career. This culminates in a controversial issue over what are the factors act as predominant contributors to get ahead in life. From my perspective, while I concede the fact that diligence and fortune are essential for fruitful outcomes, I strongly reckon that preparedness is more of importance.
On the one hand, I hold a firm belief that setting out a thorough strategy derives many benefits. To commence with, when we get an insight into our goals with sophisticated steps, decision-making afterwards will be effortless and effective. Unequivocally, the measures taken in the short-term do not always make sense in the long-term, and were it not for initial organizations, there would be no certainty whether short-range efforts will assist the future achievements. Furthermore, plans support us to pay full attention to the objectives and output. Not only can employees keep breast of the working track, but planning beforehand also motivates them and minimizes the mistakes as well as surprises that inevitably occur. As a result, the proximity to success is reduced to achieve goals.
On the other hand, there is no denying the fact that dedication and luck have some advantageous impacts. One prominent merit is that those who incapable of dealing with the excessive workload are undoubtedly offerred a great deal of promotion opportunities. Consequently, industrious workers are eligible to make more money for their living as devotion is a primary agent to productivity. Moreover, fortune plays a vital role when it comes to first opportunity. Some people get job prospects which they may take the maximum advantage of earlier than others. Hence, those people can run their own business and support their families.
In conclusion, although dedication and lucky chances are necessary for triumphant results, I believe that superb preparations are more influential. However, it is advisable for people to make the best use of all to move up the career ladder.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-04 | namanpluck | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
- In some countries schools are open till late so that children can be looked after when parents are at work Discuss the advantages and disadvantages 89
- The following chart shows the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to Housing preferences of UK people 44
- Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that millions of people still continue doing unhealthy activities What are the causes and what are the solutions for this 89
- Causes and solutions to global warming 89
- Topic Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient Other people say that computers have made life complex and stressful Discuss both view and give your own opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a incapable'.
Suggestion: who is a incapable
...acts. One prominent merit is that those who incapable of dealing with the excessive workload ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3081570997 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14340254273 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652567975831 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2499564914 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.352941176 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116017652112 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308348258546 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027063366972 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0609464844625 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180173779869 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a incapable'.
Suggestion: who is a incapable
...acts. One prominent merit is that those who incapable of dealing with the excessive workload ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3081570997 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14340254273 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652567975831 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2499564914 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.352941176 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116017652112 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308348258546 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027063366972 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0609464844625 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180173779869 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.