The following are two filter systems
The two pictures illustrate how two water filter systems are operated. In general, there are many significant differences in the two filter systems: a cross-section filter and a simple outdoor filling and storage system. It is also clear that the first system is more compact with three different filter elements, while the second one has four stages with only one filter element.
Looking at the first system in more detail, there are three different filter materials, including sand, tiny stones, and pipe holes in a single 200L meta container. Next, water is put into a container through an inlet pipe, before being filtered by sand. After that, water flows down through both tiny stones and pipe holes and then clean water escapes through an outlet
According to the second system, untreated water flows into a sand filter through a tap. Following this, it flows to a tank, where it is stored for household use. Finally, families open a tap in order to get filtered water from the tank
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-27 | Tường Vân | 84 | view |
| 2023-12-16 | ililmaidatuz | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | heroprox1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Delime | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | halinhnguyen | 78 | view |
- The maps give information about a university sports court in 1990 and now 78
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The process below shows the process of producing smoked fish
- The two maps below show the sites of the Fishery village in 1995 and in the present day 78
- In some countries The proportion of older people will become higher than that of younger people Is this positive or negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, second, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90476190476 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37499254086 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9615601773 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399658405607 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180987336987 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13029504573 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252044899581 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144571702856 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.