In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
Why might this be the case?
Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?
In some parts of the world, people are becoming more and more curious about digging up the origin of the place or building they live in. The reason for the phenomenon could vary and to some extent, this might not be regarded as a negative trend.
To commence with, this is likely to be the result of the mass media people are exposed to everyday. In today's modern era, humans are surrounded with infinite sources of information which could take place anywhere globally. Therefore, it is inevitable that an individual stumbles across an article about a person finding ancient treasure in their backyard or their houses were previously owned by people of high position of power. This news is likely to encourage people to find out more about the past of their houses and see if they are in luck. Whereas, they might be influenced by some unexpected aspects of their home. For instance, if one finds a secret basement beneath the floor of their house or a hidden room in the closet, it will be an enormous motivation for them to learn more about the place to which they have always thought to be familiar.
This situation does not have a high chance of causing negative impacts on the owners of the house. However, in some rare cases, it would bring about the feelings of discontent or even repulsion once people have found out about the origin of their house. Instancely, people would certainly not be happy if their house was previously a cemetary or the basement down your floor used to dispose of dead bodies. However, it is ultimately more rational to know all aspects of one's place than feigning ignorance in case of any unwanted situation coming up in the future.
All in all, finding out about the origin of the house or building people live in might result in certain problems. Nonetheless, it could also benefit the owners in some ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-22 | phuonganhdoan04 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | phuonganhdoan04 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | phuonganhdoan04 | 56 | view |
- SOME PEOPLE THINK GOVERNMENTS SHOULD TAKE MEASURE TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF ITS CITIZENS OTHER THINK IT MUST BE MANAGED BY INDIVIDUALS DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION 73
- the bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
- Do you agree with the statement that government should invest more monet in science education subjects to develop the country 56
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- the pie charts below show 30
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople are becoming more and more curious about digging up the origin of the place...
^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...of the mass media people are exposed to everyday. In todays modern era, humans are surro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eir houses and see if they are in luck. Whereas, they might be influenced by some unexp...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ly more rational to know all aspects of ones place than feigning ignorance in case o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, whereas, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70153846154 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40028400686 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510769230769 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5219166771 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405918107145 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138093082874 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864993945437 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259436454938 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674678941889 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.