Nowadays, many of families have both parents working. Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children, while others think childcare centers provide the best care. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There has been much debate regarding child keeping when both parents working. Although caring for them by relatives like grandparents has some advantages, there are some problems too that will be led to a tendency to keep children at special centers such as kindergartens. Personally, I find the latter more convincing.
First of all, the costs of caring for children by relatives are much lower than in childcare centers. In some cases, it may be even equal to one of the parent's income. Moreover, the keeping hours of centers have numerous limitations and will be not compatible with the working hours usually. For example, due to unexpected issues, the parents may have to extend their work hours occasionally which will be accompanied by a lot of trouble in picking the children up.
Others, however, hold the view that the best solution in this term, is keeping the children in the related centers. Firstly, they believe that being a child in the centers like kindergarten is not just in order to spend time and will be involved in learning and upbringing them. Therefore the grandparents may not be an appropriate candidate to spend time with children. For instance, they behave according to their old-fashioned opinions of children that are not applicable today. Furthermore, spending time with other children helps them to be more social and faced different attitudes that certainly assist them to prepare for the future. As the last point, the children prefer to play with their peers rather than an adult person like grandparents or other relatives. The mental development of children via playing in the centers is another consequence of caring for them in specialized places.
While caring for the children by grandparents has some pores like lower cost and not having time stress, I would argue that keeping them in the childcare centers is more beneficial because of the aforementioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | myhuyenueh94 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | myhuyenueh94 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | myhuyenueh94 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Lena Whalley | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Lena Whalley | 84 | view |
- leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people some people think the younger leaders would be better Do you agree or disagree 67
- what do you think about technology in education what are the pores and cones 67
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people Some people think younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same job What problems this causes What are the solutions 73
- the chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2019 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...ses, it may be even equal to one of the parents income. Moreover, the keeping hours of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...volved in learning and upbringing them. Therefore the grandparents may not be an appropri...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08598726115 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79990647103 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522292993631 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6433274971 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.466666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251733946627 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854594105609 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413199361805 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164131294372 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104314307219 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.