The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK University in 1987 and 2007.
The two given charts illustrate the major points that made students choose to study at UK University between 1987 and 2007.
In general, there was an increase in the proportion of students choosing UK University because of its suitable degree couruses and being close to parental, while a decline was seen in the percentage of students with the rest reasons. In addition, the students choosing the university as its suitable degree couruses consistently had the highest figures throughout the period.
The percentage of students studying at this school by its suitable degree couruses started at 35%, after which it saw a slight increase to 37% in 2007. Additionally, only 10% of students chose to study in the UK University by being close to their parents in 1987, with a subsequent two-fold rise to 22% after 20 years.
The figures for the percentage of pupils who decided to study in UK University because of its quality of teaching and resource decreased by 7% and 4% respectively, ending at 8% and 17%. A similar change, but to a much greater extent, was seen in the feature "Good sports and social activities" , which declined sharply from 19% to 6% throughout the twenty-year period.
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 67
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree and disagree with this opinion 78
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012 73
- The graph and chart below give information on the average daily maximum and minimum temperatures in degrees Celsius and the average number of days with rainfall each month for two Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 89
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 304, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...;Good sports and social activities' , which declined sharply from 19% to 6% t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.025 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90451834666 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.0270000837 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.571428571 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274655554198 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141649662153 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097967440037 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194404471252 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103161659221 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.