Some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one's ability to relate and connect to other people. Others believe that this ability is better cultivated by living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that community.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Recently, increasing people have paid attention to how to build stronger and varied social connections with other people. Some people believe that living in different places contributes to the ability to strengthen connections with others, while other people think we should facilitate our understanding of the local community. From my perspective, I consider that the mutual ideas toward this issue are not necessarily exclusive.
Firstly, living and traveling in different places do good to improve the probability of meeting aliened people and build new relationships among them. In that case, it is possible to become a social person by exchanging our ideas and interests with the latest friends. An appropriate example cannot be far away. For example, for the sake of finding adaptive space rocket techniques, the CEO of Elon Musk traveled to many places and research centers to find suitable and efficient engineers. In this way, he built a powerful and obdurate team after many meetings and interviews in different places. Otherwise, Elon Musk cannot catch the opportunity of founding such a great SpaceX company without the frequent traveling and living in many places.
Furthermore, it is universally acknowledged that a thorough investigation of the local cultural and economic surroundings contributes to deep learning of the associated community. By obtaining more information from local museums and libraries, we can get more useful and practical information regarding endemic history.
Finally, I deem it necessary to learn more knowledge from careful investigation in terms of the community's cultural background and government policies. At the same time, the opportunities of frequent traveling can also facilitate the development of new friendships with other people. By doing so, foreign countries would open the doors to new ideas and changes, which provide different life possibilities for the new generation.
Overall, in order to learn more knowledge and useful information from other places and communities, we should take the advantages of traveling and develop a deep understanding of the community. Otherwise, the bias of each side will pose negative impacts on the building of people's relationships and the comprehensive understanding of our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-09 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-06 | AmieeZhao | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | mana000 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Umaima Khan | 66 | view |
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material However a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of b 58
- Some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one s ability to relate and connect to other people Others believe that this ability is better cultivated by living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that comm 50
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and more mysterious Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- Some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one s ability to relate and connect to other people Others believe that this ability is better cultivated by living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that comm 50
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, so, then, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5734870317 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12739472978 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561959654179 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3950985641 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.875 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259984112255 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731443054471 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095540237928 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136512847318 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114386259347 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.