Many countries spend large amounts of money on preparing competitors in major world sporting events such as the Olympic Games and football World Cup. Instead, this money can be spent on encouraging children to take up sports at a young age. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that money should be spent on large global sporting events, while others think that the authorities should fund to support sport participation for children. In my opinion, both investments are necessary.
To organize main sport events, nations have to allocate money in constructing relevant infrastructure and facilities. This not only helps spread out popularity of sports but stimulate the growth of economy of the host countries. First, when citizens watch and support their athlets competing in the global events, the audience would feel a sense of national pride and social solidarity. Another merit of holding international events is that they would motivate people to join in the sport themselves thus enhance their personal health. From economic perspectives the investment in sporting encourage the flourishment of nation's economy. More jobs are created, travel sector is stimulated, spending of tourists who attend the events can be used to fund other priorities. Thus, even though the benefits of holding major sporting activities seem unclear, it contributes to the host countries in many ways.
However, given the funding of authorities for development of sport among children would result in better health and the flourisment of sport of a nation. First, it is well-known that public health is closely correlated to frequency of excercise. As governments increase investment in order to encourage the young to take part in physical activities, the health of these people would be improved. In addition, adolescents may stand a higher chance of following professional sport career thanks to more opportunities created by additional funding. As a result, more athlets would be able to compete in professional championships thus they would achieve higher positions in the contest.
In sum, although organizing sport contests would be beneficial for individuals and country as a whole, the need to develop sports among children is obvious. I concur with the view that financial resources should be spent in both.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-13 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- People nowadays prefer to interact online e g do shopping chat with friends rather than talking to other people face to face What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 89
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 84
- Most of our information comes from the Internet nowadays Some people say that a large part of the information we get is incorrect Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, so, thus, well, while, in addition, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45741324921 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95286337707 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593059936909 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8876244926 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23464671001 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734325013997 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540592541466 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15296150853 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329700107527 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.