In some cultures, the old age is more valued while in some cultures youth is more valued.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The function of culture is to enrich national identity, promote integration, and transmit accepted values. There are different kinds of beliefs and customs all over the world. Most of the culture respect their older generation for their contribution in society. However, some cultures give considerable significance to their future breadwinners. This essay discusses both views.
On the one hand, elder people not only have invaluable experience in their own life, but also show proper ways to development. In fact, they are experienced, mature, and intelligent in all the aspects of life. They show and guide paths to youngsters and play a major role in family decisions by tackling and solving many problems and difficulties with their profound knowledge and wisdom. Moreover, during the old age, people have more leisure time, which enables them to perform the desirable activities. In other words, they spend most of the life while working for fulfilling the responsibilities toward the families, such as providing good education and lifestyle to children, and for this pursuit, they often sacrifice their own preferences. Thus, in their later age they deserve comfortable and respect worthy life.
The other side of the coin, the younger generation is energetic, innovative, and assertive in nature, updated with latest technical skills and information, physically and mentally stronger, and dedicated to their goals and aims. They need appreciation and acceptance from others especially from parents. It is imperative that government supports free education for future generations. For instance, countries as Germany or the United states invest large amount of money in cultural values of education systems. For that reason, those countries are known for increasing significant value to the youth development and behavior.
In the light of these facts one can conclude that, equal importance should be given to everybody irrespective of age and gender. Care and worth age groups must be prioritized according to the needs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-30 | vishal sachdeva | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-23 | elvish singh | 82 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | Jon snow | 89 | view |
| 2018-10-26 | Hundal | 56 | view |
| 2017-01-18 | yenngoc | 73 | view |
- It is seen that older adults are not given enough respect and facilities in many countries What could be the reason for this What are effects of this 92
- Road transport is taking over rail services Discuss the positive and negative effects of this development Is this situation true for your country 56
- Some people believe that improve public health should increase the number of sports facilities others believe that it has little effects and need other measures to improve it Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
- You are attending a part time course in a college Due to some problem you cannot continue your course Write a letter to your teacher Describe the course Explain the problem Explain the reason for not continuing Tell the teacher about your future plans 78
- Many people think that home cooked food is healthy but many people still prefer eating out Why is this so 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...ative, and assertive in nature, updated with latest technical skills and information, physi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49840255591 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90423243495 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654952076677 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4563396326 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6111111111 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167780882183 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477256410746 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553469619683 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885107241649 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551938483666 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...ative, and assertive in nature, updated with latest technical skills and information, physi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49840255591 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90423243495 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654952076677 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4563396326 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6111111111 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167780882183 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477256410746 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553469619683 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885107241649 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551938483666 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.