many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past.
why is that so?
Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages?
it is well documented that there has been a paradigm shift in the public writing style to an informal register. Such development originated from the requirement to simplify language in paperwork and also personalize messages between people. Therefore, such change is by and large positive.
With the rapid explosion in population and then volume of documents, formality in writing has been eradicated to facilitate procedures, such as Visa Application, regarded as a formidable obstacle to the efficacy of a business. Such trend is widely evident in developed countries where filling form has been reduced to ticking on available options with only a few words needed, and this has enormously decreased the completion of these written records from hours to minutes. Furthermore, the use of ordinary vernacular, such as figures of speech, has also made one’s writing less starchy yet more conversational in a fashion that could attract greater attention and audience, which has proved to be an effective tool for today’s writers and management.
As a result, this trend has been of great benefit to society. For example, applicants are now less perplexed by questions in a form, thereby producing fewer mistakes and bettering the workflow of an organization. And this obviously can help minimize the costs from waiting. As to personal writing, the use of verbose language will certainly inhibit others from sustaining the conversations, while that of informal features, such as exclamations or slangs, can certainly generate the opposite effect. One should, nevertheless, not downgrade the advantage of sophisticated language, such as terminologies, which is an indicator of an individual’s sophistication and depth of knowledge.
in conclusion, the prominent reasons behind the change from formal to less formal register are mainly related to the demand for avoiding unnecessary complications in communication; However, there are occasions where “complex” language is of utility.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-14 | Johndavisvu | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | trucvy112233 | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | trucvy112233 | 84 | view |
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road system Some people think that the government should pay for this Others however think that the users should pay for the cost Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Each year the crime rate increases What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity 87
- some believe that Increasing travels between countries enables people to learn different cultures However others think this can increase tension between people from different countries Discuss both views and give your opinion 93
- Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public 56
- In many countries people buy a range of household goods Is it a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is well documented that there has been ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...phistication and depth of knowledge. in conclusion, the prominent reasons behin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60066006601 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21857823046 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610561056106 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.3300069331 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.416666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4166666667 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120251216332 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039494925328 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256403524941 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718174717653 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198275701151 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.