The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017.
The bar chart compares the average apartment prices from 1990 to 2002 with the mean apartments in 1989 in five different cities, namely New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt, and London.
It is clear that the mean house prices in most cities had increased significantly between 1990 and 2002, and the bulk of the cities’ mean house prices was higher between 1996 and 2002 than in 1989. However, the mean housing charge in Frankfurt decreased slightly between 1996 and 2002 compared with the average housing charge in 1989.
Between 1990 and 1995, most of the mean housing charges in five cities were around 5% lower compared with 1989, despite the mean housing charges in Madrid and Frankfurt being about 2% more versus 1989. In the following six years, from 1996 to 2002, the prices in New York and London rose by around 10%, and in Madrid and Tokyo, they rose by approximately 3%, while Frankfurt saw a decrease of about 1%.
Finally, in comparison with the mean housing prices in 1989 in different cities, the expenses of an apartment in New York and Madrid are about 5% above. In Frankfurt, it is only 1% higher, while the fee in London is 11% above. However, the house price in Tokyo is still 5% below the mean housing prices in 1989.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-31 | maerd z | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | maerd z | 11 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | chuquynhanh03 | 100 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | thuthao12344214 | view | |
| 2019-01-29 | DiemLinh | 89 | view |
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017 89
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73394495413 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2849931077 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454128440367 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7057491473 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0490172759664 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299185941298 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283381266493 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0427187563693 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259423885754 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.