In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
The author of this issue claims that imagination is a more important than knowledge in most professions and academic fields. Even though such a perspective may be reasonable for imagination can really bring us more possiblility without the constraints from our established knowledge, when we delve deeper, we can find other situations which could refute this perspective. Therefore, such a point of view is effective under some specific circumstance, however, I disagree with it for this point of view is not suitable for most of the situations.
To start with, I concede the reason that people are free to imagine what is possible without the constrains from our knowledge for the situation that a lot of great inventions are come from imagination. We can see the invention of the plane is based on the imagination. People could never think they can fry in the sky with their own knowledge. From my perspective, however, a main problem involved in the author' claim is that a large number of imagination can't bring the positive outcomes in professions and academic fields. We can see that compare to people's knowledge, imagination based on nothing. It's a commen case that for invention which just based on imagination can never come true since there is no actually factors to support it, and then it can't bring any real application. Under this situation, the validity of author's claim will be significant weakened.
The further reason is that a new idea based on knowledge are more likely to be accepted by people than the idea full of imagination in professions and academic fields. We know that, normally, people would like to understand and support things that they are familiar with, so they are more likely to accept the idea based on their own knowledge. Therefore, I think knowledge is more important than imagination. Given this circumstance, the author's claim will be untenable.
To sum up, there are, as I have presented before, two main reasons that I can't agree with the author's claim. Before drawing any conclusion, the author should consider more potential factors and possible situations which could impair his/her stands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 68 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | jayauen | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-28 | graybox | 66 | view |
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 50
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 62
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 62
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 73
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 62
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...em involved in the author claim is that a large number of imagination cant bring the positive out...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...m is that a large number of imagination cant bring the positive outcomes in professi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...emic fields. We can see that compare to peoples knowledge, imagination based on nothing...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...nowledge, imagination based on nothing. Its a commen case that for invention which ...
^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ally factors to support it, and then it cant bring any real application. Under this ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ally factors to support it, and then it cant bring any real application. Under this ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...esented before, two main reasons that I cant agree with the authors claim. Before dr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, i think, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06497175141 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84568172806 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485875706215 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7692354515 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0625 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231074762075 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851610359629 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713846711697 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146115377526 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042198885506 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...em involved in the author claim is that a large number of imagination cant bring the positive out...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...m is that a large number of imagination cant bring the positive outcomes in professi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...emic fields. We can see that compare to peoples knowledge, imagination based on nothing...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...nowledge, imagination based on nothing. Its a commen case that for invention which ...
^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ally factors to support it, and then it cant bring any real application. Under this ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ally factors to support it, and then it cant bring any real application. Under this ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...esented before, two main reasons that I cant agree with the authors claim. Before dr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, i think, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06497175141 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84568172806 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485875706215 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7692354515 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0625 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231074762075 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851610359629 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713846711697 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146115377526 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042198885506 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.