Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit. Discuss both these views and give your opinion
The building architecture is developing with the modern world. Many metropolises now contain high-tech skyscrapers with a large variation in their layout. Manifold believes the establishment of these should be authorized by the government while others opine that sponsors should have the liberty to select a particular design. The essay will discuss both views in the following paragraphs.
The authorities should control the blueprints of the constructions in a metropolis. Officials contain highly educated engineers who will evaluate all the aspects of construction. Such as environmental pollution, wind flow, surrounding accommodations, etc. They will also ensure all the facilities in a building such as a drainage system, ventilation, etc. However, sponsors may ignore such aspects as they are mainly concerned with their maximum profit. To cite an example, an article in Dhaka Times exhibits that about 70% of government-authorized buildings are more suitable for living than developer properties. Therefore, It is believed that the union should practice authorization on the establishment of city buildings.
On the other hand, many argue that financial figures should have a say in the layout so that they can always change the blueprints to manage it according to their economic budget. Moreover, developers are the most reliable source to take care of a building. As they obtain the most advanced knowledge of architecture, they tend to keep their skyscrapers updated and clean. For instance, about 80% of developers in America tend to keep their assets updated and clean. Even though, a responsible committee can play a similar role in the case of publicly authorized assets.
On the whole, While erecting a structure, certain aspects have been maintained. This not only improves the living quality of the residents but also prevents social hazards. Nevertheless, these trends are fully followed in a public project while some irregularities may exhibit in private. Hence, it is believed that the state should practice authorise constructions. Even though Financial personalities maintain their assets regularly, profit remains their main concern.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | Nanddy | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ndiep | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | jk1692 | 73 | view |
- The graph and pie chart below give information on in house training courses in a large financial company Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Nowadays more people prefer to communicate via text message and email instead of face to face Why do you think this is the best way When is face to face communication necessary 89
- IN SOME COUNTRIES MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE BECOMING INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THE HOUSE OR BUILDING THEY LINE IN WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR THIS HOW CAN PEOPLE RESEARCH THIS 67
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 78
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'committee'?
Suggestion: committee
...d and clean. Even though, a responsible committee can play a similar role in the case of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61585365854 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18817318305 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600609756098 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5079804886 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7142857143 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.619047619 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213115496812 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563473408563 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690362293064 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126064600541 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795763301308 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.