The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.
The line graphs present the variations in how many train passengers (in millions) and the percentage of trains running on time compared with the goal. Overall, both categories registered a surge in the number of train passengers and the proportion of trains running on time, with the target remaining unchanged throughout the period.
Starting at above 35 million, the number of passengers climbed to merely 42% before experiencing a drop to the initial data in 2003. After rocketing to its peak two years later (about 47%), the figure fell sharply towards the end of the period to more than 40% in 2009.
In terms of the proportion of trains running on time compared to the target, with the goal being consistently at 95%, the actual data in the first year had a considerable gap of 3% lower. It is also noticeable that the figure met its target in 2002 and 2006 before plunging to the starting point of 92% sharp. After that, the percentage of trains running on time witnessed a soar to 96% in 2008 and plateaued in 2009 to close the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-07 | tramy3805 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-07 | tramy3805 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-16 | phanhhh | 73 | view |
- Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and that there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagrams show the structure of a solar panel and its use 78
- The pictures illustrate the innovations of the Nature Museum from 2010 to 2013 61
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 73
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70652173913 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58163043249 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559782608696 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7716098197 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.714285714 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444454508901 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195634504856 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134467733533 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286956462664 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156846106092 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.