Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about studying history. While some argue that learning history doesn’t bring any useful knowledge and experience for us, I still believe that acquiring knowledge about what happened in the past helps us have a better understanding about the present.
There are several reasons why people believe that history tell us nothing and it is not necessary for our life. Firstly, many skills and knowledge in the past are outdated in our contemporary society. Therefore, many people believe that comprehension of history doesn’t bring any essential ideas that we need in our life. From an educational perspective, the method used to teach this discipline at school is boring and it does not help students understand the importance and benefits of this branch of learning. As a result, a range of students still have a conventional wisdom that history is a useless branch of learning and it does not tell us anything that is useful for us.
In spite of the above arguments, I support the view that learning history helps us have a better understanding of the present. First, comprehension of what happened in the past that we have when we study this discipline provides detailed information about the origin of what we have at the present and it can do wonders for us. For instance, when we study Vietnamese history and know the adversities that our ancestors had to suffer from to protect our nation, we will understand the value of independence and this can cultivate a sense of ethnic pride and patriotism. Moreover, history also describes more about the national traditions, customs and other conventional activities which create our country’s cultural identity. Consequently, we can take pride in these cultural values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-19 | Xaxaxaxa | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | adamneyul | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-20 | 지아 진 | 84 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 67
- Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities privately owned vehicles should be banned in city centers while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 67
- Some people think that it is better for older schoolchildren to study a large number of subjects and develop a range of knowledge Others argue that they should study a smaller number of subjects and focus on details Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13286713287 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88377398197 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0573799702 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301515778156 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122144365943 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832627276513 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22114222991 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220014422662 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.