Many employees may work at home the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only workers, not employers. Do you agree or disagree?
There has been a growing trend that workers are entitled to work from home thanks to technological advancements. Some people belive that only staff are beneficial , while company owners receive nothing from the movement. I somewhat disagree with this point of view as both wage-earners and their employers can reap benefits from the development, albeit there are few drawbacks.
Working at home acts as a predecessor to the enhancement in employees' productivity and job satisfaction, implying the merits for organizations. If people are allowed to work at their own safe haevens, they are relieved of the burden of managers' supervision, the factor plays a key role in impeding wokers' perfomances. Without the psychological disturbance, individuals thus work more effectively and make a greater contribution to their firms. Another virtue for people working at home is that they may have more time with their families, which enables workers to strengthen their relationships with other family members. This provides working people with a sense of family solidarity and fulfillment, thereby focusing on and excelling at their jobs. Distance working makes employees happier and ameliorating them of negative implications at conventional workplaces; it is thus beneficial to employers.
Admittedly, there are still occassions when remote working can backfire. There are wokers who may take advantage of the lack of managers' observations for their own sake. It is not uncommon for salary earners to play games, or listen to music in the working hours. These types of people, however, are few. The advantages of working from home are still underscored.
In sum, I mostly object to the view that only ordinary workers can be benefited from the phenomenon that workers work from home. While few individuals may exploit the entitlement for their own goods, the majority of people working at their places of living witness the improvement in working conditions, which means that employers are also merited.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-29 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
- People nowadays prefer to interact online e g do shopping chat with friends rather than talking to other people face to face What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 84
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many supermarkets are selling more and more products that are imported from other countries instead of selling food that is locally sourced What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...le belive that only staff are beneficial , while company owners receive nothing fr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41853035144 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00819738231 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565495207668 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1897043031 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308042341753 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992923933533 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536836837414 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194628390509 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563905926911 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.