Some people think that parents have a powerful influence in child’s life, while the influence from outside the home plays a bigger part of child’s development. To what extent do you agree or disagree
In the modern society era, there is a people's assumption that developing child’s faculty affected by people possessing blood bound has fewer impacts than the effect of intercommunication. Partially, I consent to the same point of view which I will elaborate in the following paragraph.
Perhaps, the influence of peers’ interaction plays a greater part of developing child’s ability in terms of behaviour and habit. This occurs because the intensive communication engaging their surroundings can lead child to find exemplary figures. Hence, this will maximise the potentials to build independent character shaping them to what they will experience. Furthermore, the funding of facilities for school environment considerably impacts for preparing child’s talent, such as the provision of international school (sophisticated facilities and expert teachers). Those probably enhance child’s core skill aiming them to pursue their dream which will be indeed beneficial for their future career.
On the other hand, the children’s closest circumstance (parents) holds the crucial role, as the first pedagogue, teaching moral and value. This includes the way to communicate and respect to humankind, considering immensely important for interacting. Subsequently, youngsters would make it as a principal guide held throughout their life. In addition, financial ability of parents should have guaranteed both children's nutrition and health, such as budgeting for healthy foods, vegetables and meats, even since a baby was born. It is vitally necessary for them at the growing phase, not only to strengthen their physical body but also to avoid disablement caused by malnutrition.
To sum up, it appears to me that the parents' influence holds the key role toughening up youth development including to shape well-mannered individual and to uphold ongoing childcare expense. This is as long as interaction between young-aged people and all of school parts is effortlessly facilitated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-27 | Andi Irwan Nur | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | Andi Irwan Nur | 78 | view |
- Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 70
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 70
- Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Employers nowadays put more emphasis on social skills Some people believe that social skills are important in addition to good qualifications for job success Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are a peoples'?
Suggestion: there are a peoples
In the modern society era, there is a peoples assumption that developing child’s facu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
In the modern society era, there is a peoples assumption that developing child’s facu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, well, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72203389831 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19414143396 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674576271186 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.273465421 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.571428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173229996634 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529533800631 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573275487824 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959683779566 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355594680814 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.