Describe the presented chart.
The presented chart provides information about the numbers of trips done by school students to and from their schools by different ways in the years 1990 and 2010. As shown in the chart, one group of school students can make their trips as car passengers. In addition, other three groups chose walking, taking the bus, or a combination of both. Fifth group decided to go to school by cycling.
In 1990, the highest number of walking trips and lowest number of trips by a car were reported. 2010 trips analysis results has provided the complete contradiction of that. Children traveling to their schools by a car were almost doubled in 2010. Moreover, the total amount of walking trips in 2010 is nearly half the amount in 1990.
There is a significant drop in the number of children walking to their schools from more than 12 million trips in 1990 to 6 million trips 2010. That dramatic decrease should be further studied and analyzed. Although there is a huge attention towards children health nowadays, parents still drive their kids to school by car rather than having them walking to their schools. There is a huge grow in the number of children traveling to school as car passengers from less than 6 million trips in 1990 to almost 11 million trips in 2010.
- Internet helps student better than teacher in learning class especially for children What extend to agree and disagree to this statement 73
- Please explain how your proposed studies at the University of Oxford are of relevance to the Muslim world 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comaparisons where relevant 73
- Describe the presented chart 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to walk'.
Suggestion: to walk
.... In addition, other three groups chose walking, taking the bus, or a combination of bo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om more than 12 million trips in 1990 to 6 million trips 2010. That dramatic decr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, still, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75113122172 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43269802823 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493212669683 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4333298983 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0487867906687 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0214962312786 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501117461028 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0427960115163 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605226999018 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.