The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007.
The two given maps illustrate the development in the layout of a particular small local museum and its grounds in 1957 and 2007.
In general, it can be seen that there were significant changes in the layout of the local museum. The museum increased in size, while the number of trees dramatically declined.
The national history exhibition replaces the local history located in the heart of the building. A museum storeroom was knocked down to renovate a small café at the right corner of the building. There is a reception between the museum shop and the café, and a special exhibition next to an education center.
The entrance in the middle of the building was to the left-hand side, where a new museum shop was renewed in 2007. In 1957, visitors could go to the museum via the small path, which was destructed in 2007. All trees are chopped down and removed from the roadside to the rear of the museum. Finally, people constructed a car park by the roadside.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | Nguyen Anh Quach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | ramnu kaur | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | hadgrid | view |
- 18 2 2022 New technologies have changed the way children spend their free tieme Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 67
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 61
- 18 6 2016 Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places How can its popularity be increased 84
- An increasing number of advertisement on TV aim at children What are the effects of television advertisement SHould televison advertisements be controlled 56
- 3 11 2016 Schools should not force chldren to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while, as to, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69411764706 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55551510257 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.6102014268 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.8 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300235381711 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108896420476 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967383838148 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189458921813 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935518295216 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.