The digram below shows a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007.
The stipulated map diagram explicated the information about a small community museum and its surrounding between 1957 and 2007.
In general, it is readily apparent from map presentation that, art gallery undergone through significant changes and modifications. The new cafe, car park, reception area, and other places were added.
Initially, it is clearly visible that at the ground level, the portrait in 2007 divulged that all the trees have been removed from roadside and also most of them to the left to nearby museum. Moreover, the driveway was vanished and a car park had built by the roadside. Further, the entrance has been moved from the middle of the building to left-hand side of the art foundation, where a new museum shop was constructed.
Probing further, new facility introduced namely reception which was located along with cafe on southwest side. The national history exhibition had turned into a local history room. Additionally, the special exhibition and education center were also added on north direction. However, the garden situated at same place as in 1957.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | Nguyen Anh Quach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | ramnu kaur | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | hadgrid | view |
- Some people think that art should be necessary in schools while others say that it is unuseful discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- It has been suggested that primary school childern should learn how to grow vegetables and raise animals Do advantages outweigh its disadvantages 73
- Public transport should be funded by the government and should be free for public what extent do you agree or disgree 73
- The chart below provides the information on the percentage of national consumer expenditure by category 2002 84
- The digram below shows a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27586206897 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75905169047 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695402298851 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9389789809 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162423852308 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572486669967 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998333629494 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11569088267 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134491891115 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.